<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tom Bihn Aeronaut True Carry-on Bag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practicaltravelgear.com/tom-bihn-aeronaut-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practicaltravelgear.com/tom-bihn-aeronaut-review/</link>
	<description>Travel gear reviews, gadgets reviews, and travel clothing that is worth packing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:35:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://practicaltravelgear.com/tom-bihn-aeronaut-review/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicaltravelgear.com/?p=3#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Thanks.  I&#039;ve been lucky I guess as I&#039;ve never been questioned.  Although I don&#039;t really try to pull anything either.  Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.  I&#8217;ve been lucky I guess as I&#8217;ve never been questioned.  Although I don&#8217;t really try to pull anything either.  Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://practicaltravelgear.com/tom-bihn-aeronaut-review/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicaltravelgear.com/?p=3#comment-77</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think they worry about the top part as long as it&#039;s in the ballpark. You need to be under 42 or 45 linear inches total for most airlines and this bag is way under that. Leaving off wheels makes a huge difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think they worry about the top part as long as it&#8217;s in the ballpark. You need to be under 42 or 45 linear inches total for most airlines and this bag is way under that. Leaving off wheels makes a huge difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://practicaltravelgear.com/tom-bihn-aeronaut-review/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicaltravelgear.com/?p=3#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Great website and I have a dumb question for you.

In the photo of the carry-on sizer, doesn&#039;t the bag need to fit below the top of the box as well?

Anyway.  Great info.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great website and I have a dumb question for you.</p>
<p>In the photo of the carry-on sizer, doesn&#8217;t the bag need to fit below the top of the box as well?</p>
<p>Anyway.  Great info.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://practicaltravelgear.com/tom-bihn-aeronaut-review/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicaltravelgear.com/?p=3#comment-69</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t think any usable bag actually fit into those bins they have by the checkin counter. I guess removing the wheels makes all the difference. Will have to check this out as half the time I end up having to gate check my &quot;carry on&quot; bag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think any usable bag actually fit into those bins they have by the checkin counter. I guess removing the wheels makes all the difference. Will have to check this out as half the time I end up having to gate check my &#8220;carry on&#8221; bag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

